And usually, they will emphasize RAD latest, when you are trying to accomplish something more difficult. Ideal for prototypes, quick and dirty tools, and proofs-of-concept. That’s why many of these solutions sell their products as Rapid Application Development tools. Of course, exceptions always prove the rule, but fundamentally, a great many develop simpler utilities. Your “backend” code is most likely the smallest issue you’ll have when doing mobile development.Īlmost all cross-development tools do a very good job on smaller programs, with a manageable UI and functionality. You should design your UI for portrait and landscape mode, etc. In addition, the way you integrate help, sign your programs and deploy them differs. mobile devices, cell phones or tablets, then hopefully you will design your UI completely differently (gestures, responsiveness, etc.). Is it as easy as salespeople tell us? Yes and no. But even JAVA, which previously ran exclusively in its VM, can now compile with tools “natively” for different platforms. Some solutions use a virtual machine for their approach and very few compile “natively” for all platforms. Many, many options, some for decades, some relatively new, and many with challenges when trying to develop something more sophisticated. Add to that mix, flutter, fyne.io, Xamarin, and. Java, Xojo, LiveCode, PureBasic, B4X, windev are only a few examples. Is it really as easy, as clicking a button and to compile for all platforms? For decades it sounds promising to have ONE code base and to be able to use it for many platforms without having to reinvent the wheel every time.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |